The Law of One, Book II, Session 33
March 1, 1981
一的法則:卷二, 第三十三場集會
1981 年 3 月 1 日
Ra: I am Ra. I greet you in the love and in the light of the one infinite Creator. I communicate now.
RA : 我是 Ra ,我在太一無限造物者的愛與光中 , 向你們致意 。 我現在開始通訊 。
Questioner: In our last session you said that each of us in these sessions should look well to the vital energies necessary for nondepletion of the instrument and the contact level. Did that mean that we should look at the instrument’s vital energies or be careful of our own vital energies?
發問者: 在我們上次集會中,你說我們每一個參與集會的人應該好好看顧必須的生命能,好讓器皿與接觸水平不受損耗 。 那是否意味著我們 [ 也就是 Jim 與我 ] 應該看顧器皿的生命能,或小心 ( 照顧 ) 我們自己的生命能 ?
Ra: I am Ra. Each entity is responsible for itself. The mechanics of this process taking place involve firstly, the use of the physical bodily complex of third-density with its accompanying physical material in order to voice these words. Thus this instrument needs to watch its vital energies carefully, for we do not wish to deplete this instrument. Secondly, the function of the supporting group may be seen to be firstly, that of protection for this contact; secondly, that of energizing the instrument and intensifying its vital energies.
RA : 我是 Ra ,每個實體對自己負責 。 這個過程的機制首先與肉體複合體及伴隨的材料之使用有關,這是為了能夠發聲說出這些話 。 於是這個器皿需要留神看守自己的生命能 , 因為我們不想耗盡這個器皿 。
其次 , 支援小組的機能有二 : 可以被視為這個通訊的保護 ; 以及供給器皿能量並強化其生命能 。
This supporting group has always, due to an underlying harmony, been of a very stable nature as regards protection in love and light, thus ensuring the continuation of this narrow band contact. However, the vital energies of either of the supporting members being depleted, the instrument must then use a larger portion of its vital energies, thus depleting itself more than would be profitable on a long-term basis.
這個支援小組由於根本的和諧,總是能在非常穩定的狀態提供愛與光的保護 , 因此確保這個窄頻接觸的繼續 。 然而 , 如果支援成員中任何一個生命能被耗盡,器皿則必須使用自己更大部分的生命能 , 於是消耗自我的程度會大於長期的有利基準 。
Please understand that we ask your apology for this infringement upon your free will. However, it is our distortion/understanding that you would prefer this information rather than, being left totally to your own dedication/distortion, deplete the instrument or deplete the group to the point where the contact cannot be sustained.
請見諒,我們向你們道歉,因為這個冒犯你們自由意志的舉動 。 無論如何 , 就我們的變貌 / 理解,你們會比較喜歡得到這個資訊 ; 而非完全由你們自己的貢獻 / 變貌來決定 , 導致器皿或小組的耗盡,最後不能持續這個通訊 。
Questioner: Can you give us advice on how to maintain the best possible condition for maintaining contact?
發問者: 你可否給予我們忠告,如何維繫可能的最佳狀態以維持通訊 ?
Ra: I am Ra. We have given information concerning the proper nurturing of this channel. We, therefore, repeat ourselves only in two ways in general.
Firstly, we suggest that rather than being, shall we say, brave and ignoring a physical complex weakness/distortion it is good to share this distortion with the group and thus perhaps, shall we say, remove one opportunity for contact which is very wearying for the instrument, in order that another opportunity might come about in which the instrument is properly supported.
RA : 我是 Ra ,我們已經給予關於適當滋養這個管道的資訊 。 因此 , 我們只以兩個方式重複自己 。 首先 , 我們建議與其英勇地忽略肉體複合體的弱點 / 扭曲 , 將這個扭曲與小組分享比較好 。 或許當器皿很疲倦的時候,除去一次接觸的機會 。 等到器皿被適當地支援,可以產生另一個機會 。
Secondly, the work begun in harmony may continue in harmony, thanksgiving and praise of opportunities and of the Creator. These are your protections. These are our suggestions. We cannot be specific for your free will is of the essence in this contact. As we said, we only speak to this subject because of our grasp of your orientation towards long-term maintenance of this contact. This is acceptable to us.
其次 , 這個工作開始於和諧中 , 可以在和諧、感恩、與 讚美 各種 機會及造物者當中繼續下去 。 這些是你們的保護 。
以上是我們的建議 。 我們不能說具體的細節,因為你們的自由意志是這個通訊的要素 。 如我們剛才所說 , 我們只談論主題,由於我們理解你們的態度朝向長期維持這個通訊 。 這樣對我們而言是可以接受的 。
Questioner: Thank you very much. We have a device for so-called color therapy, and since we were on the concept of the different colors in the last session I was wondering if this would in some way apply to the principle of color therapy in the shining of particular colors on the physical body. Does this create a beneficial effect and can you tell me something about it?
發問者: 非常謝謝你 。 這個器皿 有個裝置,其用途是所謂的顏色療法 。 既然我們在過去的集會討論不同顏色的概念 , 我好奇地想知道是否可以將這些概念應用在顏色療法,好比照射特定的顏色在肉體上。這樣做是否會產生有益的效應,你可以告訴我一些這方面的事情嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This therapy, as you call it, is a somewhat clumsy and variably useful tool for instigating in an entity’s mind/body/spirit complex an intensification of energies or vibrations which may be of aid to the entity.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這個療法 , 如你所稱 , 是個有些笨拙且用處變化不定的工具 , 這個工具煽動一個實體的心 / 身 / 靈複合體強化其能量或振動 , 以幫助該實體 。
The variableness of this device is due firstly to the lack of true colors used, secondly, to the extreme variation in sensitivity to vibration among your peoples.
這個裝置的變化不定是由於:第一 , 缺乏真實顏色的使用 ; 第二 , 你們人群對於振動的敏感度有著極大的變化程度 。
Questioner: I would think that you could achieve a true color by passing light through a crystal of the particular color. Is this correct?
發問者: 我想你可以將光通過特定顏色水晶來達成一個真實顏色 。 這樣說是否正確 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This would be one way of approaching accuracy in color. It is a matter of what you would call quality control that the celluloid used is of a varying color. This is not of a great or even visible variation, however, it does make some difference given specific applications.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這會是逼近準確顏色的一種方式 。 這個問題你可以歸類為品質管制,如同使用不同顏色的 賽璐珞 。 其間的差異並不大,肉眼甚至無法辨別 , 但在特定的應用上則會造成不同 ( 的影響 )。
Questioner: Possibly you could use a prism breaking white light into its spectrum and screening off all parts of the spectrum except that which you wish to use by passing it through a slit. Would this be true?
發問者: 我們可能用一個三稜鏡將白光打散到它的光譜中,並隔絕光譜的所有部分,然後藉由一個狹縫,使我們想要它通過的部分得以通過。這個結果是否為真實?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這是正確的。
Questioner: I was wondering if there is a programming of experiences that causes an individual to get certain catalysts in his daily life. For instance, as we go through our daily life there are many things which we can experience. We can look at these experiences as occurring by pure chance or by a conscious design of our own such as making appointments or going places. I was wondering if there was a behind-the-scenes, as you might call it, programming of catalyst to create the necessary experiences for more rapid growth in the case of some entities. Does this happen?
發問者: 謝謝你, 我想知道是否有個經驗的程式導致一個 人 在他日常生活中獲得特定的催化劑 。 舉例來說 , 當我們度過日常生活,有許多我們可以經驗的事情 。
我們可以看待這些經驗為純然的運氣,或我們自己有意識的設計 , 如排定約會 , 去特定地方等 。 我在想是否有個幕後操作 , 一個催化劑的程式,某些實體可據此創造必須的經驗,以更快速的成長 。 這情況是否發生 ?
Ra: I am Ra. We believe we grasp the heart of your query. Please request further information if we are not correct.
RA : 我是 Ra ,我們相信我們掌握你詢問的核心 。 如果我們說得不對,請要求更進一步的資訊 。
The incarnating entity which has become conscious of the incarnative process and thus programs its own experience may choose the amount of catalyst or, to phrase this differently, the number of lessons which it will undertake to experience and to learn from in one incarnation. This does not mean that all is predestined, but rather that there are invisible guidelines shaping events which will function according to this programming. Thus if one opportunity is missed another will appear until the, shall we say, student of the life experience grasps that a lesson is being offered and undertakes to learn it.
已經意識到降生過程的肉身實體能夠撰寫自己經驗的程式 可以選擇催化劑的數量 , 或用不同的說法 , 實體在一生中準備學習與經驗的課程數目 。 這並不意味一切都是注定的 , 毋寧說有個無形的指導方針依據程式來雕塑 ( 人生 ) 事件 。 因此如果錯過一個機會,另一個就會出現,直到[容我們說 ] 生命經驗的學生掌握到被給予的課程,並著手學習它 。
Questioner: Then these lessons would be reprogrammed, you might say, as the life experience continues. Let’s say that an entity develops the bias that he actually didn’t choose to develop prior to incarnation. It is then possible to program experiences so that he will have an opportunity to alleviate this bias through balancing. Is this correct?
發問者: 那麼 , 你可以說 , 當生命的經驗持續下去,這些課程可被重新編寫 。 好比說一個實體發展了一個偏見 , 那是他降生前沒有選擇的項目 , 那麼 , 有可能重新編寫他的經驗程式 , 好讓他有機會透過平衡 ( 過程 ) 減輕這個偏見 。 這是正確的嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This is precisely correct.
RA : 我是 Ra ,精準地正確 。
Questioner: Thank you. From this I would extrapolate to the conjecture that the orientation in mind of the entity is the only thing that is of any consequence at all. The physical catalyst that he experiences, regardless of what is happening about him, will be a function strictly of his orientation in mind. I will use as an example (example deleted) this being a statement of the orientation in mind governing the catalyst. Is this correct?
發問者: 謝謝你 , 從已知這點我推測出一個結論,就是實體心智中的定向是唯一具有重要影響的因素 。 他所經驗的物理催化劑 , 不管是什麼事件 , 都可斷然地說是他心智定向的函數 。 我將用一個例子[ 這個例子被刪除 ] …
這個例子做為心智定向主宰催化劑的聲明 。 這是否正確 ?
Ra: I am Ra. We prefer not to use any well-known examples, sayings, or adages in our communications to you due to the tremendous amount of distortion which any well-known saying has undergone. Therefore, we may answer the first part of your query asking that you delete the example. It is completely true to the best of our knowledge that the orientation or polarization of the mind/body/spirit complex is the cause of the perceptions generated by each entity. Thus a scene may be observed in your grocery store. The entity ahead of self may be without sufficient funds. One entity may then take this opportunity to steal. Another may take this opportunity to feel itself a failure. Another may unconcernedly remove the least necessary items, pay for what it can, and go about its business. The one behind the self, observing, may feel compassion, may feel an insult because of standing next to a poverty-stricken person, may feel generosity, may feel indifference.
RA : 我是 Ra ,在我們與你的通訊中,我們比較喜歡不用任何廣為人知的例子 , 名言 , 格言 ; 由於任何廣為人知的名言所承受的大量扭曲 。 因此 , 我們可以回答你詢問的第一部分,但要求你刪除這個例子 。 就我們最佳的 認識 , 心 / 身 / 靈複合體的定向或極化是一個實體產生覺知的起因 , 這完全是真實的 。 我們可以觀察一個雜貨店的場景 :( 結帳時 ) 在自我前方的實體資金不足 。 一個實體會利用這個機會偷竊 ; 另一個因這個機會覺得自己是個失敗者 ; 另一個毫不在乎地拿掉最不需要的物品 , 盡可能地付清款項 , 然後繼續做自己的事 。
在自我後方的實體 , 觀察到這件事 , 可能感到憐憫 ; 因為站在窮人的 後面 , 可能感到侮辱 ; 可能覺得慷慨 ; 可能漠不關心 。
Do you now see the analogies in a more appropriate manner?
你現在是否在這個類比看到更適當的表現方式 ?
Questioner: I think that I do. Then from this I will extrapolate the concept which is somewhat more difficult because as you have explained before, even fourth-density positive has the concept of defensive action, but above the level of fourth-density the concept of defensive action is not in use. The concept of defensive action and offensive action are very much in use in our present density.
發問者: 我想我看到了 。 那麼從這裡我推測出一個有些困難的概念,因為你曾經解釋 , 即使第四正面密度也有防衛行動的概念 , 但第四密度之上的密度則不使用防衛行動 。 防衛行動與攻擊行動的概念在我們目前的密度被使用得非常多 。
I am assuming that if an entity is polarized strongly enough in his thought in a positive sense that defensive action is not going to be necessary for him because the opportunity to apply defensive action will never originate for him. Is this correct?
我假設如果一個實體思想的正面極化程度夠強烈,對他而言將不再需要防衛行動,因為採取防衛行動的機會絕不會從他發起 。 這樣說正確嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This is unknowable. In each case, as we have said, an entity able to program experiences may choose the number and the intensity of lessons to be learned. It is possible that an extremely positively oriented entity might program for itself situations testing the ability of self to refrain from defensive action even to the point of the physical death of self or other-self. This is an intensive lesson and it is not known, shall we say, what entities have programmed. We may, if we desire, read this programming. However, this is an infringement and we choose not to do so.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這是不可知 的 。 在每一個例子 , 如我們曾說 , 一個能夠編寫經驗的實體,可以選擇學習課程的數目與強度 。 一個極度正面導向的實體有可能編寫出某種情境測試自我的能力,是否即使面臨自我或他人肉身死亡,仍然可以避免 ( 採取 ) 防衛行動 。 這是個很強烈的課程 , 容我們說 , 無法得知實體曾為自己編寫了什麼課程 。 如果我們渴望 , 我們可以閱讀這個 ( 經驗 ) 程式 。 無論如何 , 這是個冒犯 , 我們選擇不這麼做 。
Questioner: I will ask you if you are familiar with a motion picture called The Ninth Configuration . Are you familiar with this?
發問者: 我要問你是否熟悉一部電影叫做第九配置 ( the Ninth Configuration )? 你熟悉這部片嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. We scan your mind and see this configuration called The Ninth Configuration.
RA : 我是 Ra ,我們掃描你的心智 複合體 , 並看到第九配置的輪廓 。
Questioner: This motion picture brought out the point about which we have been talking. The Colonel had to make a decision. I was wondering about his polarization. He could have knuckled under, you might say, to the negative forces, but he chose to defend his friend instead. Is it possible for you to estimate which is more positively polarizing: to defend the positively oriented entity, or to allow suppression by the negatively oriented entities?
發問者: 這部電影帶出我們談論到現在的重點 。( 在影片中 ) 該上校必須做個決定 , 我想知道他的極性 。
他可以屈服於負面的力量之下 , 但他選擇防衛他的朋友 。 你是否可能評估何者較為正面極化 : 防衛正面導向的實體 , 或允許負面導向實體的壓制 ? 你可以回答這個問題嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This question takes in the scope of fourth-density as well as your own and its answer may best be seen by the action of the entity called Jehoshuah, which you call Jesus. This entity was to be defended by its friends. The entity reminded its friends to put away the sword. This entity then delivered itself to be put to the physical death. The impulse to protect the loved other-self is one which persists through the fourth-density, a density abounding in compassion. More than this we cannot and need not say.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這個問題可以放在第四密度以及你們 ( 第三 ) 密度的視野中來看待 , 而它的最佳解答可以看 Jehoshuah , 你們稱為耶穌 , 的行為 。 這個實體被他的朋友防衛著 , 這個實體提醒他的朋友放下劍 * 。 然後將自己交付出去,導致其肉身死亡 。 想要保護摯愛的其他 - 自我是一股持續存在的衝動 , 持續穿越 第四密度 , 一個充滿憐憫心的密度 。 其他的我們不能也不需要說了 。
( * 譯註 : 請參考聖經馬太福音第 26 章 52 節 ; 約翰福音第 18 章 11 節 。)
Questioner: Thank you. As we near the end of this master cycle there may be an increasing amount of catalyst for entities. I am wondering if, as the planetary vibrations mismatch somewhat with the fourth-density vibrations and catalyst is increased, if this will create more polarization thereby getting a slightly greater harvest?
發問者: 謝謝你 , 當我們接近大師週期的盡頭 , 或許給予實體的催化劑份量會增加 。 我在想地球振動與,第四密度振動的一些不匹配 , 以及催化劑的增加 ; 這些現象是否會創造更多的極性,藉此獲得稍微多一些 正面 收割 ? 相同地,也將增加多一些負面收割。不幸地,地球在這個過渡期間也將有更多的催化效應。 這過程會發生嗎?
Ra: I am Ra. The question must be answered in two parts. Firstly, the planetary catastrophes, as you may call them, are a symptom of the difficult harvest rather than a consciously programmed catalyst for harvest. Thus we do not concern ourselves with it, for it is random in respect to conscious catalyst such as we may make available.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這個問題必須分兩部分來回答 。 首先 , 地球上的大災難 , 如你所稱 , 是困難收割的一個徵兆 , 並非為了收割而有意識編寫的催化劑 。 所以 我們並不擔心 , 因為相對於可茲利用的有意識之催化劑,它是隨機發生的 。
The second portion is this: the results of the random catalyst of what you call the earth changes are also random. Thus we may see probability/possibility vortices going towards positive and negative. However, it will be as it will be. The true opportunities for conscious catalyst are not a function of the earth changes but of the result of the seniority system of incarnations which at the time of the harvest has placed in incarnation those whose chances of using life experiences to become harvestable are the best.
第二部分回答如是 : 隨機催化劑的結果 , 你們所稱的地球變動 , 也是隨機的 。 於是我們可以看到或然率 / 可能性漩渦走向正面與負面 。 無論如何 , 它將會是它本然的樣子 。 有意識催化劑的真正機會並不是地球變動的函數,而是老靈魂 ( seniority ) 降生系統的結果 , 這個系統在收割時刻 給予靈魂最佳的機會去使用生命經驗成為可以收割的狀態 。
Questioner: Is this seniority system also used in the service to self side for becoming harvestable on that side?
發問者: 這個老資格系統也用在服務自我那一邊 使靈魂成為可收割狀態 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. You may ask one more full question at this time.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這是正確的 。 你可以在此時再問一個完整的問題 。
Questioner: What I would like for you to do is list all the major mechanisms designed to provide catalytic experience that do not include interaction with other-self. That is the first part.
發問者: 我想要你做一件事 列出所有主要提供 催化 經驗的機制,但不包括與其他 - 自我的互動 。 這是問題的第一部份 。
Ra: I am Ra. We grasp from this question that you realize that the primary mechanism for catalytic experience in third-density is other-self. The list of other catalytic influences: firstly, the Creator’s universe; secondly, the self.
RA : 我是 Ra ,我們從這個問題 掌握 到你了解在第三密度, 催化 經驗的主要機制是 其他 - 自我 。 其他 催化 影響的列表 : 首先 , 造物者的宇宙 ; 其次 , 自我 。
Questioner: Can you list any sub-headings under self or ways the self is acted upon catalytically which would produce experience?
發問者: 在自我或自我之道這個標題下 , 你能否列出一些子 - 標題,它們皆可被催化劑作用 以 產生經驗 ?
Ra: I am Ra. Firstly, the self unmanifested. Secondly, the self in relation to the societal self created by self and other-self. Thirdly, the interaction between self and the gadgets, toys, and amusements of the self, other-self invention. Fourthly, the self relationship with those attributes which you may call war and rumors of war.
RA : 我是 Ra ,首先 , 未 顯化的自我 。
其次 , 自我 和 社會性自我 [ 由自我與其他 - 自我所創造 ] 之間的關係 。
第三 , 自我與 小器具 、玩具、娛樂活動 , 以及其他 - 自我的發明之間的互動 。
第四 , 自我與你所稱的戰爭與戰爭流言之間的關係 。
Questioner: I was thinking possibly of the catalyst of physical pain. Does this go under this heading?
發問者: 我在想可能還有肉體病痛的催化劑 。 這點是否也在這個標題底下 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct, it going under the heading of the unmanifested self; that is, the self which does not need other-self in order to manifest or act.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這是正確的 , 它會在 未 顯化自我標題底下 。 未 顯化自我也就是不需要其他 - 自我來顯化或作用的自我 。
Questioner: Do we have enough time left to ask the second part of this question which is to list all major mechanisms designed to provide the catalyst that include action with other-self?
發問者: 我們是否還有足夠時間詢問這個問題的第二部分,即列出與其他 - 自我互動中,所有主要提供催化劑的機制 ? 我們還有足夠的時間嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. You have much time for this, for we may express this list in one of two ways. We could speak infinitely, or we could simply state that any interaction betwixt self and other-self has whatever potential for catalyst that there exists in the potential difference between self and other-self, this moderated and undergirded by the constant fact of the Creator as self and as other-self. You may ask to this question further if you wish specific information.
RA : 我是 Ra ,你有許多的時間 , 我們可以在兩種方式,任選一種來表達這個列表 。 我們可以無限地 述說 , 或只單純地陳述任何自我與其他 - 自我的互動 。
只要自我與其他 - 自我存在潛在 ( 位能 ) 的差異 , 都是有潛能的催化劑 。
這個過程被一個恆常的事實 主持 與 支持 , 即造物者 等同 ( as ) 自我,也 等同 其他 - 自我 。 你可以進一步發問,如果你想要特定的資訊 。
Questioner: I believe that this is sufficient for the time being.
發問者: 以目前而言 我相信這些已經足夠 。
Ra: I am Ra. Do you have a brief query or two before we close this working?
RA : 我是 Ra ,在我們結束這個工作前,你是否有 一個或兩個 簡短的詢問 ?
Questioner: Yes, here is one question. Is there any difference in violet ray activity or brightness between entities who are at entrance level both positive and negative to fourth-density?
發問者: 唔,等我一分鐘,我此時想不到什麼簡短的問題,等我一分鐘。
是的 , 這裡有個問題 。 一個實體在第四正面密度的入口層次 , 另一個實體在第四負面密度的入口層次 , 他們在 紫羅蘭光芒 的活動或明亮度會有任何不同嗎 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This correct. The violet ray of the positive fourth-density will be tinged with the green, blue, indigo triad of energies. This tinge may be seen as a portion of a rainbow or prism, as you know it, the rays being quite distinct.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這是正確的 。 第四正面密度的紫羅蘭光芒將被染上 ( tinged ) 綠色、藍色、靛藍色 三和弦 ( triad ) 能量 。 這個色調可以看做是彩虹或三稜鏡的一部份 , 各個光芒相當地 清楚 。
The violet ray of fourth-density negative has in its aura, shall we say, the tinge of red, orange, yellow, these rays being muddied rather than distinct.
第四負面密度的紫羅蘭光芒 , 容我們說 , 它的靈光 ( aura ) 帶著紅色 , 橙色 , 黃色的色調 , 這 三個 光芒是 渾濁 的 , 而非 清楚分明 。
Questioner: What would the rays of fifth and sixth-density look like?
發問者: 做為上個問題的補充部分 , 第五與第六密度 的光芒看起來像什麼 ?
Ra: I am Ra. We may speak only approximately. However, we hope you understand, shall we say, that there is a distinctive difference in the color structure of each density.
RA : 我是 Ra ,我們只能大約地述說 。 無論如何 , 我們希望你理解到,在每個密度的顏色架構都有顯著的不同 。
Fifth density is perhaps best described as extremely white in vibration.
描述第五密度,或許最佳的形容是極度的白色振動 。
The sixth-density of a whiteness which contains a golden quality as you would perceive it; these colors having to do with the blending into wisdom of the compassion learned in fourth-density, then in sixth the blending of wisdom back into an unified understanding of compassion viewed with wisdom. This golden color is not of your spectrum but is what you would call alive.
第六密度是一種包含著金色品質的白色 , 以你們可能觀察到的樣子而言 ; 這些顏色與 ( 以下過程 ) 有關 : 調和 慈悲 [ 在第四密度中學習 ] 進入 智慧 ( 第五密度 ); 然後在第六 ( 密度 ) 以 智慧 ( 之眼 ) 觀看,調和智慧重新 進入 一個對 慈悲 的 統合理解 。
這個金色不屬於你們的光譜 , 而是 [ 你們會稱為 ] 鮮活的 ( 顏色 )。
You may ask one more question briefly.
你可以再問一個簡短的問題 。
Questioner: Then I will ask if there is anything that we can do to make the instrument more comfortable or to improve the contact?
發問者: 那麼我問有沒有什麼我們可以做的 , 好讓這器皿更舒適 , 或改善這個通訊 ?
Ra: I am Ra. This working is well. You are attempting to be conscientious. We thank you. May we say we enjoyed your vision of our social memory complex drinking one of your liquids while speaking through this instrument.
RA : 我是 Ra ,這次工作是好的 。 你們嘗試成為謹慎認真的 。 我們謝謝你們 。 我們要說,我們享受你們對於我們社會記憶複合體的幻想 。 當透過這個器皿說話時,飲一杯 你們的液體 * 。
( * 譯註 : " 你們的液體 " 背後的故事 : 有一天 , 我們三個在開玩笑 , 我們討論 Ra 群體在集會中可能會做什麼 , 其中一個猜想他們大概開著一台敞篷跑車 , 上下顛倒地在空中行駛著 , 車上幾個 " 人 " 互相傳遞罐裝啤酒 , 當一個問題進來 , 他們會說 " 誰要接這個問題 ? " 他們其中一位就會接手 , 開始回答問題 … 他們喜歡這種無厘頭蠢話 ! ☺ -- Carla 憶述 。)
I am Ra. I leave you in the love and in the light of the one infinite Creator. Go forth, then, rejoicing in the power and the peace of the one infinite Creator. Adonai.
我在太一無限造物者的愛與光中離開你們 , 向前去吧,在太一無限造物者的大能與和平中歡欣鼓舞 。 Adonai 。
(本次集會結束)
留言列表